Regional Innovation Policy in Encouraging Regional Competitiveness in South Tangerang City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.269-279Keywords:
regional innovation, regional competitiveness, public serviceAbstract
Public service is an important issue for the sustainability of a city. To create excellent service, supporting cities such as South Tangerang and other cities are required to develop smart cities as a new way to serve the community. This study aims to further examine regional innovation policies in encouraging regional competitiveness in South Tangerang City. This research used qualitative descriptive research methods. The descriptive research method is used to describe regional innovation policies in South Tangerang City as a unit of analysis based on the facts as they are. The data collection technique in this study uses interview techniques by collecting information from various stakeholders such as government officials, executive and legislative ranks, Businesses/MSME actors, and communities involved in implementing innovation to improve regional heads and regional competitiveness in South Tangerang City. This study concludes that the implementation of regional innovation policies in South Tangerang has not been maximized. In addition to the quality of human resources, several agencies have not been creative in creating innovations. It can be seen from the control of innovation held by the mayor as the regional head. Furthermore, the role of the Regional Head in implementing innovation to improve regional performance and competitiveness is very important, considering that leaders must be able to leverage the knowledge management movement in government organizations so that organizational knowledge development can be executed into much-needed innovation. Recently, the South Tangerang City Government needed to implement the RAJADO model (Replication, Authority, Innovation Network, Budget, and Digitalization/Online).
Downloads
References
Aditiasari, D. (2018, August 19). Rasio Penduduk Usia Produktif Tangsel Capai 64%, Begini Cara Kelolanya. DetikFinance. https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-4174982/rasio-penduduk-usia-produktif-tangsel-capai-64-begini-cara-kelolanya
Alwasilah, A. C. (2003). Pokoknya Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar Merancang dan Melakukan Penelitian Kualitatif. Pustaka Jaya.
Bermara, G. (2019, April 1). Aduan Warga Dicuekin, TRUTH Sebut Sistem Pelayanan Publik di Tangsel Bobrok dan Minta Menpan RB Cabut Penghargaan. Bantenhits.com. https://bantenhits.com/2019/04/06/aduan-warga-dicuekin-truth-sebut-sistem-pelayanan-publik-di-tangsel-bobrok-dan-minta-menpan-rb-cabut-penghargaan/
Fachrudin, M. A., & Yuwono, T. (2017). Inovasi Kepemimpinan Kepala Daerah (Studi Kasus Walikota Surabaya Ir. Tri Rismaharini, MT). Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 6(2), 141–150. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/16077
Gardiner, B., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2004). HEAD. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1045–1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000292638
Ginting, A., Supriyono, B., & Noor, I. (2016). Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Daya Saing (Studi pada Provinsi Bengkulu). Wacana, Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 19(01), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.wacana.2016.019.01.7
Hadi, S. (2020, May 20). Kota Cerdas Melayani. Ombudsman RI. https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/artikel--kota-cerdas-melayani
Jayanti, R. T. (2018, July 22). Pelayanan Publik dalam Pemerintahan yang Baik (Good Governance). FaktualNews.co. https://faktualnews.co/2018/07/22/pelayanan-publik-dalam-pemerintahan-yang-baik-good-governance/89698/
Karma Resen, M. G. S. (2015). Inovasi Daerah (Refleksi dan Pengaturan Inovasi Daerah di Indonesia). Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 4(4), 680–687. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i04.p07
Khotimah, H., & Budi, S. (2020). Analisis Peran Inovasi, Kompetensi Akuntansi, dan Dukungan Pemerintah terhadap Daya Saing UMKM Kota Tangerang Selatan. Keberlanjutan: Jurnal Manajemen dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 5(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.32493/keberlanjutan.v5i2.y2020.p117-130
Muhrisya, A. K., & Sabar, W. (2021). Asesmen Daya Saing Ekonomi Daerah dengan Pendekatan Model Dynamic. ICOR: Journal of Regional Economics, 1(1), 1–13. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/icor/article/view/17720
Narutomo, T. (2014). Program Penguatan Sistem Inovasi Daerah (SIDa) sebagai Exit Strategy Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM). Jurnal Bina Praja, 06(02), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.06.2014.143-156
Nasution, E. K., & Hidayat, P. (2015). Analisis Daya Saing Ekonomi Kota Tanjungbalai. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 3(2), 72–88. https://jurnal.usu.ac.id/index.php/edk/article/view/11727
Orange, G., Elliman, T., Lian Kor, A., & Tassabehji, R. (2007). Local government and social or innovation value. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506160710778086
Pekkarinen, S., Hennala, L., Harmaakorpi, V., & Tura, T. (2011). Clashes as potential for innovation in public service sector reform. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(6), 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551111163639
Pramesti, F. A. (2021, April 6). Ringkasan Laporan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah Kota Tangsel 2020. Suara.com. https://www.suara.com/news/2021/04/06/225506/ringkasan-laporan-penyelenggaraan-pemerintah-daerah-kota-tangsel-2020?page=all
Pranadji, T. (2006). Pengembangan Daerah Penyangga sebagai Upaya Pengendalian Arus Urbanisasi. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 4(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v4n4.2006.328-342
Prasetyaningsih, T. (2018, March 28). Tata Kelola Kota dengan Prinsip “Sustainable.†Kompasiana.com. https://www.kompasiana.com/triprasetyaningsih76/5abad446dd0fa856af143d92/tata-kelola-kota-dengan-prinsip-sustainable-keberlanjutan
Prayoga, A., Fahmi, I., & Asmara, A. (2017). Daya Saing BMT Berdasarkan Aspek Kelembagaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Infokop, 27. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18299.57122
Putra, I. G. A. B. A. (2021, March 13). Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah Tangsel yang Tak Selesaikan Masalah. Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/metro/2021/03/13/kebijakan-pengelolaan-sampah-yang-tak-selesaikan-masalah
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Rutriana. (2020, April 1). Pengukuran Daya Saing Daerah melalui Pemetaan Inovasi. P2 TTG - LIPI. https://ttg.lipi.go.id/kunjungan-Pengukuran-Daya-Saing-Daerah-Melalui-Pemetaan-Inovasi-065749
Setijaningrum, E. (2020). Inovasi Kebijakan Pelayanan Publik: Best Practice di lndonesia. Airlangga University Press (AUP).
Sigalingging, A. H., & Warjio. (2014). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan (Studi Kasus pada Kecamatan Sidikalang Kabupaten Dairi). Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 4(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.31289/JAP.V4I2.1383
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suhendra, A. (2018). Inovasi Daerah dalam Reformasi Pemerintahan Kota Tangerang Selatan dan Kota Magelang. Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 2(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.2.1.2018.39-48
Suparno. (2017). Inovasi Daerah untuk Meningkatkan Iklim Investasi. Mimbar Administrasi, 12(17), 1–14. http://jurnal.untagsmg.ac.id/index.php/mia/article/view/567
Wahid, U., & Amalia, N. (2020). Tantangan Humas Pemerintah Daerah dalam Upaya Publikasi Inovasi Program Smart City. Nyimak: Journal of Communication, 4(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v4i1.2300
Wajib, N. (2016, November 16). Pentingnya Penjaminan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Arsip Warta-Kotaku.pu.go.Id. http://kotaku.pu.go.id:8081/wartaarsipdetil.asp?mid=8434&catid=2&
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
