The Role of NGOs as Civil Society Control in Corruption Eradication in North Bengkulu Regency

  • Halilul Khairi Institute of Domestic Governance
Keywords: Corruption, Social Control, Non-Governmental Organizations, Investigation

Abstract

The role of NGOs is important because it is carried out directly by the community in general without any restrictions in terms of both quantity and time, so it is expected that it is difficult for collusion to happen between NGOs and corruptors. However, in practice, the role of NGOs can become elitist and NGOs are not rooted in the community and do not represent the interests of the wider community so that the role of NGOs can be manipulated by officials for personal gains. This study aims to describe the role of NGOs in its function as a social control agent in the eradication of corruption in North Bengkulu Regency. By using a qualitative approach and descriptive type of research, data collection is done through interviews, documentation, and observational studies. The results of this study indicate that there are 3 (three) main roles of NGOs, namely educative, advocative, and investigative roles. The role of non-governmental organizations in building community awareness is only carried out by a small number of NGOs with limited frequency. The role of non-governmental organizations in the form of advocacy on government policies is carried out passively by providing input when requested by local governments such as in meetings or discussions arranged by the government. The role of non-governmental organizations in the form of demonstrations against corruption behavior and practices is still very limited by non-governmental organizations in North Bengkulu. While the role of non-governmental organizations in the form of investigations on corrupt practices has been carried out by almost all non-governmental organizations engaged in the eradication of corruption and the monitoring of the administration of governance in North Bengkulu, but follow-up efforts to encourage an official investigation into the results of the investigation have not been maximized and even some Non-governmental organizations utilize the results of investigations to obtain personal gains.

References

Agnew, R. (1991). A Longitudinal Test of Social Control Theory and Delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Deliquency, 28(2), 126–156. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427891028002002

Alrasyid, M. H. (2005). Peran Civil Society dalam Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Madani, 1(1).

Antlöv, H., Ibrahim, R., & Van Tuijl, P. (2012). NGO governance and accountability in Indonesia: Challenges in a newly democratizing country. NGO Accountability Politics, Principles and Innovations, (July), 147–163. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781849772099

Bardhan, P. (2014). A Review Development : of Issues, 35(3), 1320–1346.

Booth, J. A., Farrell, A., & Varano, S. P. (2008). Social Control, Serious Delinquency, and Risky Behavior. Crime & Delinquency (Vol. 54). http://doi.org/10.1177/0011128707306121

Campos, N. F., & Giovannoni, F. (2017). Political institutions, lobbying and corruption. Journal of Institutional Economics, (April 2017), 1–23. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000108

Epperly, B., & Lee, T. (2013). Corruption and NGO Sustainability: A Panel Study of Post-communist States. Voluntas, 26(1), 171–197. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9404-3

Gruber, J. E. (1988). Controlling Bureucratic: Dillemmas in Democratic Governance. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Henderson, J. V., & Kuncoro, A. (2011). Corruption and local democratization in Indonesia: The role of Islamic parties. Journal of Development Economics, 94(2), 164–180. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.01.007

Ketut, S. (2006). Civil Society di Aras Lokal. Salatiga: Percik.

Lopa, B. (1997). Masalah Korupsi dan Pemecahannya. Jakarta: Kipas Putih Aksara.

Mark, D. C. (1978). Encyclopedia Americana. New York: Americana Corporation.

Mayhew, S. H. (2005). Hegemony, politics and ideology: The role of legislation in NGO-government relations in Asia. Journal of Development Studies, 41(5), 727–758. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220380500145263

Ndraha, T. (2005). Kybernologi: Sebuah Rekonstruksi Ilmu Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Rock, M. T. (2009). Corruption and democracy. Journal of Development Studies, 45(1), 55–75. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220380802468579

Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rothstein, B., & Eek, D. (2009). Political corruption and social trust: An experimental approach. Rationality and Society, 21(1), 81–112. http://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108099349

Scanlan, G. (2004). The control of corruption. Journal of Financial Crime, 11(4), 316–321. http://doi.org/10.1108/13590790410809257

Transparency International. (2017a). Corruption Perceptions Index.

Transparency International. (2017b). Global Corruption Barometer.

Widodo, J. (2001). Good Governance: Telaah Dari Dimensi Akuntabilitas dan Kontrol Birokrasi. Jakarta: Insan Cendikia.

Winarno, B. (2002). Teori dan Proses Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.

Published
2018-11-12
Section
Articles