e-Government Maturity Model Based on Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.08.2016.263-275Keywords:
e-Government, maturity model portal, meta-ethnographyAbstract
Maturity model based on e-Government portal has been developed by a number of researchers both individually and institutionally, but still scattered in various journals and conference articles and can be said to have a different focus with each other, both in terms of stages and features. The aim of this research is conducting a study to integrate a number of maturity models existing today in order to build generic maturity model based on e-Government portal. The method used in this study is Systematic Review with meta-ethnography qualitative approach. Meta-ethnography, which is part of Systematic Review method, is a technique to perform data integration to obtain theories and concepts with a new level of understanding that is deeper and thorough. The result obtained is a maturity model based on e-Government portal that consists of 7 (seven) stages, namely web presence, interaction, transaction, vertical integration, horizontal integration, full integration, and open participation. These seven stages are synthesized from the 111 key concepts related to 25 studies of maturity model based e-Government portal. The maturity model resulted is more comprehensive and generic because it is an integration of models (best practices) that exists today.
Downloads
References
Alhomod, S. & Shafi, M. (2012). Best Practices in E-Government: A Review of Some Innovative Models Proposed in Different Countries. International Journal Of Electrical & Computer Sciences IJECS-IJENS, 12(1), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.ijens.org/IJECS%20Vol%2012%20Issue%2001.html.
Almazan, R. & Gil-Garcia, J. E-Government Portals in Mexico. Electronic Government, 1726-1734. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2.ch131.
Andersen, K. & Henriksen, H. (2006). E-Government Maturity Models: Extension of the Layne and Lee Model. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 236-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008.
At the Dawn of e-Government: The Citizen as Customer. (2000). New York, NY.
Baum, C. & Maio, A. (2016). Gartner’s Four Phases of E-Government Model. Gartner.com. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/doc/317292/gartners-phases-egovernment-model.
Chandler, S. & Emanuels, S. (2002). Transformation Not Automation. In Proceedings of 2nd European Conference on E-Government (pp. 91-102). Oxford, UK: St. Catherine’s College.
Chen, H. (2002). Digital Government: Technologies and Practices. Decision Support Systems, 34(3), 223-227.
Chen, J., Yan, Y., & Mingins, C. (2011). A Three-Dimensional Model for E-Government Development with Cases in China’s Regional E-Government Practice and Experience. In 2011 International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government (pp. 113-120). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.
Davies, P. (2008). e-Government Best Practices - Learning from Success, Avoiding the Pitfalls. Presentation, World Bank.
Fath-Allah, A., Cheikhi, L., Al-Qutaish, R., & Idri, A. (2014). E-Government Maturity Models: A Comparative Study. International Journal Of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), 5(3), 71-91. Retrieved from http://www.airccse.org/journal/ijsea/vol5.html.
Furuholt, B. & Wahid, F. (2008). E-Government Challenges and the Role of Political Leadership in Indonesia: The Case of Sragen. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008) (p. 411). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.
Government on the Web II - National Audit Office (NAO). (2016). National Audit Office. Retrieved from https://www.nao.org.uk/report/government-on-the-web-ii/.
Green, S. (2005). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Singapore Med J, 46(6), 270-274.
Greenwood, N. & Mackenzie, A. (2010). Informal Caring for Stroke Survivors: Meta-ethnographic Review of Qualitative Literature. Maturitas, 66(3), 268-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.03.017.
Hammond, N. & Perry, A. (2002). Systematic Reviews: The Experiences of a PhD Student. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 2(1), 32-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/plat.2002.2.1.32.
Hiller, J. & Bélanger, F. (2001). Privacy Strategies for Electronic Government. Arlington, VA: The Pricewaterhouse Coopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
Howard, M. (2001). E-Government across the Globe: How Will “E†Change Government. Government Finance Review, (4).
Ifinedo, P. & Singh, M. (2011). Determinants of eGovernment Maturity in the Transition Economies of Central and Eastern Europe. Electronic Journal Of E-Government, 9(2), 166-182. Retrieved from http://www.ejeg.com/volume9/issue2.
Istiyanto, J. & Sutanta, E. (2012). Model Interoperabilitas Antar Aplikasi E-Government. Jurnal Teknologi Technoscientia, 4(2), 137-148. Retrieved from http://technoscientia.akprind.ac.id/techno/media.php?act=journalokabs?1082.
Jaya, S. (2013). Implementasi dan Perkembangan E-Government di Indonesia. Jurnal Informatika Multimedia (JIM), 2(1), 37-52. Retrieved from http://jim.stimednp.ac.id/.
Jupp, V. & Rohleder, S. (2003). eGovernment Leadership: Engaging the Customer. Accenture.
Kim, D. & Grant, G. (2010). E-Government Maturity Model Using the Capability Maturity Model Integration. Journal Of Systems And Information Technology, 12(3), 230-244. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13287261011070858.
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews.
Kondisi Situs Web Pemerintah Daerah. (2009). Depkominfo. Retrieved from http://www.depkominfo.go.id.
Layne, K. & Lee, J. (2001). Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four Stage Model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1.
Lee, G. & Kwak, Y. (2012). An Open Government Maturity Model for Social Media-Based Public Engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 492-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001.
Lehmkuhl, T., Baumöl, U., & Jung, R. (2013). Towards a Maturity Model for the Adoption of Social Media as a Means of Organizational Innovation. In 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3067-3076). Grand Wailea, Maui, Hawaii: Conference Publishing Services. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.561.
Lewin, S. (2008). Methods to Synthesise Qualitative Evidence Alongside a Cochrane Intervention Review. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
McDermott, E., Graham, H., & Hamilton, V. (2004). Experiences of being A Teenage Mother in the UK: A Report of a Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. Social and Public Health Services Unit.
Moon, M. (2002). The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196.
Napitupulu, D. (2015). Kajian Faktor Sukses Implementasi E-Government Studi Kasus: Pemerintah Kota Bogor. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 5(3), 229-236. Retrieved from http://id.portalgaruda.org/?ref=browse&mod=viewarticle&article=313616.
Netchaeva, I. (2002). E-Government and E-Democracy: A Comparison of Opportunities in the North and South. International Communication Gazette, 64(5), 467-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17480485020640050601.
Nilashi, M., Bagherifard, K., Ibrahim, O., Janahmadi, N., & Alizadeh, H. (2012). A Multi-Criteria Approach to the Evaluation of Malaysian Government Portal. Journal Of Theoretical And Applied Information Technology, 40(2), 194-201.
Noblit, G. & Hare, R. (1988). Meta-Ethnography - Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Obi, T. (2015). 2015 Waseda – IAC International E-Government Ranking Survey. Tokyo: Institute of e-Government, Waseda University. Retrieved from http://e-gov.waseda.ac.jp/pdf/2015_Waseda_IAC_E-Government_Press_Release.pdf.
Paulk, M., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M., & Weber, C. (1993). Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Carnegie Mellon University.
Paulk, M., Weber, C., Curtis, B., & Chrissis, M. (1996). The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Estados Unidos: Addison-Wesley.
PeGI Tingkat Provinsi pada Tahun 2014. (2014). Retrieved from http://pegi.layanan.go.id/download/tabel_pegi_2014/HASIL%20PROVINSI%202014.bmp.
Reddick, C. (2004). A Two-Stage Model of E-Government Growth: Theories and Empirical Evidence for U.S. Cities. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 51-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2003.11.004.
Ronaghan, S. (2002). Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective. New York: United Nations-DPEPA & ASPA. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2010-Survey/Complete-survey.pdf.
Shahkooh, K., Saghafi, F., & Abdollahi, A. (2008). A Proposed Model for E-government Maturity. In Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications. Damascus, Syiria: IEEE.
Siau, K. & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing E-Government Stage Models – A Meta-Synthesis Based on Meta-Ethnography Approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(4), 443-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570510592352.
Siswanto,. (2010). Systematic Review Sebagai Metode Penelitian untuk Mensintesis Hasil-hasil Penelitian (Sebuah Pengantar). Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan, 13(4), 326-333. Retrieved from http://ejournal.litbang.depkes.go.id/index.php/hsr/article/view/2766.
Tabel Hasil PeGI | Pemeringkatan e-Government Indonesia (PeGI). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://pegi.layanan.go.id/tabel-hasil-pegi-4/.
Tuquero, J. (2011). A Meta-Ethnographic Synthesis of Support Services in Distance Learning Programs. Journal Of Information Technology Education, 10, 157-179. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ940910.
UN E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People. (2012). New York. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2012-Survey/unpan048065.pdf.
UN E-Government Survey 2014: E-Government for the Future We Want. (2014). New York. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2014-Survey/E-Gov_Complete_Survey-2014.pdf.
Wescott, C. (2001). E-Government in the Asia-pacific region. Asian Journal Of Political Science, 9(2), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02185370108434189.
West, D. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x.
West, D. (2007). Global E-Government, 2007 (pp. 1-25). Providence, Rhode Island: Center for Public Policy Brown University. Retrieved from http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt07int.pdf.
Widiatmoko, H. (2009). E-Government di Indonesia: Content Analysis Situs Web Pemerintah Daerah (Master Thesis). Universitas Indonesia.
Windley, P. (2002). eGovernment Maturity. Utah: State of Utah. Retrieved from http://www.windley.com/docs/eGovernment%20Maturity.pdf.
World Development Indicators 2003: World Development Indicators. (2016). Elibrary.worldbank.org. Retrieved from http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/0-8213-5422-1.
World Report on Knowledge for Better Health: Strengthening Health Systems. (2016). Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/rpc/meetings/en/world_report_on_knowledge_for_better_health2.pdf.
Yalia, M. (2011). Menuju Pelayanan Publik Yang Lebih Baik dengan E-Government. Buletin Observasi, 9(2), 63-74.
