Examining Flypaper Effect in Indonesia

Evidence After Transferring Urban-Rural Land and Building Tax to Locals Government

Authors

  • Raden Muhammad Afrizal Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia
  • Khoirunurrofik Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.465-478

Keywords:

PBB-P2, panel event studies, flypaper effect, local government, spending

Abstract

In order to increase the tax power of local governments, the central government implemented a major reform in 2010 by transferring the Urban-Country Land and Buildings Tax (PBB-P2) to local governments. Although the tax contributes a significant portion of local government revenues, the spending behavior of local governments is questionable, and it is unclear whether public spending has been increased. This study examines the effect of strengthening PBB-P2 policy on increasing local revenue (PAD) and its impact on regional spending patterns, specifically whether there are still flypapers after policy reform. Applying a fixed-effects panel data method to Indonesian local governments from 2005 to 2020, we found that strengthening PBB-P2 policy had a significant positive impact on PAD. The positive effect was found to be significant one year (year +1) after policy implementation in each region, including for the province, district, and city, with the issuance of regional ordinances related to PBB-P2. Interestingly, the significant increase in PAD impacted regional spending patterns. Thus, the flypaper effect phenomenon did not exist from 2005 to 2020. This implies that the central government can selectively empower local governments to levy appropriate local taxes and user fees. This can be done by providing new local tax sources, restructuring tax types, simplifying usage fee types, and harmonizing regional government regulations with the central government.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acosta, P. (2010). The “Flypaper Effect†in Presence of Spatial Interdependence: Evidence from Argentinean Municipalities. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(3), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0277-0

Aritenang, A. F. (2008). A Study on Indonesia Regions Disparity: Post Decentralization (MPRA Paper No. 25245). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25245/

Cárdenas, O. J., & Sharma, A. (2011). Mexican Municipalities and the Flypaper Effect: Mexican Municipalities and the Flypaper Effect. Public Budgeting & Finance, 31(3), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2011.00990.x

Clarke, D., & Tapia-Schythe, K. (2021). Implementing the Panel Event Study. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 21(4), 853–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X211063144

Ernayani, R. (2017). Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah, Dana Alokasi Umum, Dana Alokasi Khusus dan Dana Bagi Hasil terhadap Belanja Daerah (Studi Kasus pada 14 Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Periode 2009-2013). JSHP (Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan), 1(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.32487/jshp.v1i1.234

Green, K. (2005). Decentralization and Good Governance: The Case of Indonesia (MPRA Paper No. 18097). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18097/

Hamilton, B. W. (1983). The Flypaper Effect and Other Anomalies. Journal of Public Economics, 22(3), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(83)90040-3

Haryanto, J. T. (2017). Mapping the Local Own Resources (PAD) Performance and Regional Dependence in Indonesia 2008-2014: Quadrant Method Approach. Jurnal Bina Praja, 9(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.41-52

Hines, J. R., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: The Flypaper Effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.217

Inayati, N. I., & Setiawan, D. (2017). Fenomena Flypaper Effect pada Belanja Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Indonesia. EKUITAS: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 1(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2017.v1.i2.2062

Karnik, A., & Lalvani, M. (2008). Flypaper Effect Incorporating Spatial Interdependence. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 20(2), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-940X.2008.00143.x

Khairi, H. (2021). Balance Between Delegation of Authority and Submission of Regional Revenue Sources in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.431-443

Kharisma, B. (2013). Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi: Sebelum dan Sesudah Era Desentralisasi Fiskal di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 14(2), 101–119. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/esp/article/view/1249

Lewis, B. (2013). Local Government Capital Spending in Indonesia: Impact of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Local Government Capital Spending in Indonesia. Public Budgeting & Finance, 33(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2013.12002.x

Liando, I. I., & Hermanto, S. B. (2017). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Belanja Daerah pada Kabupaten/Kota Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 6(6). http://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/1234

Liu, Y., & Zhao, J. (2011). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers and Local Tax Efforts: Evidence from Provinces in China. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 14(4), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2011.591175

Melo, L. (2002). The Flypaper Effect under Different Institutional Contexts: The Colombian Case. Public Choice, 111(3/4), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014964318685

Panao, R. A. L. (2021). Beyond Flypaper: Unconditional Transfers and Local Revenue Generation in the Philippines, 1992–2016. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(15), 1341–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1759628

Sanusi, A., & Yusuf, M. (2018). Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah, Produk Domestik Regional Bruto, Jumlah Penduduk, Indeks Pembangunan Manusia, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi terhadap Belanja Daerah di Sumatera Utara Tahun 2013-2015 Pendekatan Panel Regression. Jepa: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik, 3(1), 50–56. https://jurnal.pancabudi.ac.id/index.php/jepa/article/view/201

Simanjuntak, K. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Desentralisasi Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 07(02), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.07.2015.111-130

Sour, L. (2013). The Flypaper Effect in Mexican Local Governments. Estudios Económicos, 28(1), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v28i1.82

Sunaryo, B., & Cicellia, C. (2014). Urgensi Peningkatan Kapasitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah di Era Desentralisasi (Dinamika Pengelolaan Pajak Parkir Kecamatan Banguntapan, Kabupaten Bantul Provinsi DI. Yogyakarta). Jurnal Bina Praja, 06(04), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.06.2014.293-305

Temenggung, Y. A., Moenek, R., Suwanda, D., & Mulyadi, M. (2020). The Fiscal Capacity of the New Autonomous Region (DOB) in Increasing Economic Growth and Eradication of the Poor. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.75-87

Wibowo, E. A., & Oktivalerina, A. (2022). Analisis Dampak Kebijakan Desentralisasi Fiskal terhadap Penurunan Tingkat Kemiskinan pada Kabupaten/Kota: Studi Kasus Indonesia pada 2010-2018. Bappenas Working Papers, 5(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v5i1.117

Downloads

Published

2022-12-26

How to Cite

Afrizal, R. M., & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2022). Examining Flypaper Effect in Indonesia: Evidence After Transferring Urban-Rural Land and Building Tax to Locals Government. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.465-478

Issue

Section

Articles