Evaluation of Jakarta Province in Information and Technology Management

Authors

  • Ella Wargadinata Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  • Ezzat Sayid Aly Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  • Alma'arif Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.453-464

Keywords:

IT governance audit, COBIT 2019, information technology, maturity level

Abstract

Electronic government has become an important issue in Indonesia's bureaucratic reform. Aside from the big-bang decentralization policy, e-govt has endorsed national concerns to digitize the rigid manual procedures of public services. Jakarta, as the capital city, emphasizes IT- the backbone of administration. IT is yet widely used by Jakarta to get a new shape in Jakarta's capabilities and capacities. Over two decades, passing different governors, Jakarta persistent injected IT into public administration, launching integrated IT applications to present a smart city. Despite the award of Jakarta digital services, Jakarta IT management should be evaluated. The approach used in the research to examine the symptoms of the object of study is a mixed-method approach with a sequential model. The informant selection technique uses purposive sampling. Informants' selection process by adjusting the business processes in COBIT 2019 using the RACI Chart method. The data analysis techniques used Guttman Scale. The result shows the appropriate business processes are: APO02 (managed strategy), APO03 (driven architecture), BAI05 (managed organizational change), and DSS06 (managed business process control). The study results show that the capability level is t of 4 scales as a target. The gap value of 0.25 indicates that technology and information management have been implemented and running well, but each business process needs improvement to reach the maximum level. Despite the gap between as-is and to-be, Jakarta's capability level is impressive. It reflects the persistent injection of IT with adequate support. The Jakarta province needs to pay attention to software and hardware compatible with the organization's vision and improve coordination among divisions. Training, staffing, dispatching, and rotating need qualified human resources to enhance organizational performance. DKI Jakarta Province also needs routine monitoring, evaluating problems, and documenting all business processes as a source of information.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alma’arif, & Wargadinata, E. L. (2022). Adopting Open Government in Local Development Planning: A Study on Bekasi Regency. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik), 26(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.64692

Aritonang, D. M. (2017). The Impact of E-government System on Public Service Quality in Indonesia. European Scientific Journal, 13(35), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n35p99

Basu, S. (2004). Eâ€Government and Developing Countries: An Overview. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860410001674779

Bayastura, S. F., Krisdina, S., & Widodo, A. P. (2021). Analisis Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Framework Cobit 2019 pada PT. Xyz. JIKO (Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer), 4(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.33387/jiko.v4i1.2977

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dharma, M. (2015). The Contribution of E-government to Trust in the Government: Correlating Trust in the Government With Satisfaction With E-service by Using Transparency, Responsiveness, Accessibility, and Security as Determinants [Master Thesis]. Universiteit Twente.

Hermana, B., & Silfianti, W. (2011). Evaluating E-government Implementation by Local Government: Digital Divide in Internet Based Public Services in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(3), 156–163.

Huda, M., & Yunas, N. (2016). The Development of e-Government System in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 08(01), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.08.2016.97-108

ISACA. (2018a). COBIT® 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives. ISACA.

ISACA. (2018b). COBIT® 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.

ISACA. (2018c). COBIT® 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing and Optimizing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.

Manoby, W. M., Afriyanni, A., Fitri, S. E., Pranasari, M. A., Setyaningsih, E., Rosidah, R., & Saksono, H. (2021). Digital Village: The Importance of Strengthening Village Resilience in the Digital Age. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.53-63

Masyhur, F. (2017). Penelitian e-Government di Indonesia: Studi Literatur Sistematis dari Perspektif Dimensi Pemeringkatan e-Government Indonesia (PeGI). Jurnal IPTEK-KOM, 19(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.33164/iptekkom.19.1.2017.51-62

Napitupulu, D. (2016). E-Government Maturity Model Based on Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography Approach. Jurnal Bina Praja, 8(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.08.2016.263-275

Napitupulu, D. (2017a). A Conceptual Model of E-Government Adoption in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(4), 1471–1478. http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9&Itemid=1&article_id=2518

Napitupulu, D. (2017b). Empirical Study of Critical Success Factors for E-Government Implementation in Indonesia Based on Factor Analysis Approach. Jurnal Bina Praja, 9(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.83-99

Prahono, A. & Elidjen. (2015). Evaluating the Role E-government on Public Administration Reform: Case of Official City Government Websites in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 59, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.334

Rofi, A., Putra, F., & Sentanu, I. G. (2021). Creating Innovation of Public Value Through Management Information Systems. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.513-528

Rokhman, A. (2011). E-Government Adoption in Developing Countries; The Case of Indonesia. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2(5), 228–236.

Sosiawan, E. A. (2008). Evaluasi Implementasi E-Government pada Situs Web Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia: Prespektif Content dan Manajemen. Prosiding Semnasif, 1(5), 88–98. http://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/semnasif/article/view/759

Srivastava, N. (2015). E-Governance in Rural India. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 6(1), 741–744.

Syamsuddin, I. (2011). Evaluation of E-government Initiatives in Developing Countries: An ITPOSMO Approach.

Wicaksono, B., Asta, R., & Rafi, M. (2021). Comparative Study: Dimension Policy of Smart People in Metropolitan City of Bandung, Jakarta, and Pekanbaru. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.21787/jpb.13.2021.93-103

Downloads

Published

2022-12-26

How to Cite

Wargadinata, E., Aly, E. S., & Alma’arif, A. (2022). Evaluation of Jakarta Province in Information and Technology Management. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.453-464

Issue

Section

Articles