Balance Between Delegation of Authority and Submission of Regional Revenue Sources in Indonesia

Authors

  • Halilul Khairi Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.431-443

Keywords:

local autonomy, expenditure, authority, financial autonomy

Abstract

Since 1946, Indonesia has adopted a decentralization policy that impacts the transfer of authority to regulate and administer government affairs in the regions, followed by financing to manage these affairs. In a unitary state, the power source, both in terms of financial management and administrative power, rests with the central government. This study uses a descriptive qualitative method to explain the history of the development of authority and financial balance policies in Indonesia and the meaning of decentralization policies in Indonesia. Quantitative descriptive was used to analyze data regarding the implementation of regional government affairs, personnel expenditure ratios, comparison of central and regional expenditures, and other data related to burdens and revenues between the center and the regions. This study found that the central government has recognized regional independence through income sources managed by themselves and reduced transfer funds that aim to cover the lack of regional revenues. The provision of sources of revenue from the central government to the regions is not proportional to the ratio of the burden given. The results of this study indicate that the load is inversely related to the budgetary capacity between the government and local governments. The imbalance between the workload and the source of revenue received by the region is the low ability of the region to provide basic services that are the authority.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andini, A. (2020, August 13). Angka Kematian Ibu di Indonesia masih jauh dari target SDGs. Lokadata. https://lokadata.id/artikel/angka-kematian-ibu-di-indonesia-masih-jauh-dari-target-sdgs

CNN Indonesia. (2020, October 6). Kemendikbud: Sekolah Kekurangan 1 Juta Guru Hingga 2024. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20201005180513-20-554645/kemendikbud-sekolah-kekurangan-1-juta-guru-hingga-2024

Dewi, R. S. (2019, July 2). Pelayanan Publik dalam Pemerataan Pendidikan dan Sistem Zonasi. Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. https://ombudsman.go.id/pengumuman/r/artikel--pelayanan-publik-dalam-pemerataan-pendidikan-dan-sistem-zonasi

Handayani, A. P., & Badrudin, R. (2019). Evaluation of Village Fund Allocation on Indonesia. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.2003129

Hoessein, B. (1993). Berbagai Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Besarnya Otonomi Daerah Tingkat II. Universitas Indonesia.

Hussain, S., Hali, S. M., Ahmad, R., Iqbal, S., & Iftikhar, H. (2021). Fiscal decentralization and poverty alleviation: A case study of Pakistan. Poverty & Public Policy, 13(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.304

Karenina, S., Andayani, K. D., Aditya, I. A., & Wasil, M. (2021). Tingkat Kemandirian Keuangan Daerah dan Implikasinya terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Kabupaten Bojonegoro Tahun 2010-2019. Journal of Regional Economics Indonesia (JREI), 2(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.26905/jrei.v2i1.6180

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Indonesia. (2021). APK & APM untuk SD, SMP, dan SM (termasuk Madrasah dan Sederajat).

Koeswara, H. (2016). The Optimization of Budget Outcome to Create Trust in Public Expenditure Allocation on Local Budget. Jurnal Bina Praja, 8(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.08.2016.277-291

Kwabena Obeng, S. (2021). Fiscal decentralization, democracy and government size: Disentangling the complexities. Journal of International Development, 33(6), 975–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3545

Mainali, R., Tosun, M. S., & Yang, J. (2021). Fiscal decentralization, intergovernmental transfer reform and conflict in Colombian municipalities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, September 2020, 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101108

Mukhlis, M., & Makhya, S. (2019). Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Implikasinya terhadap Kinerja Otonomi Daerah Pasca Pemekaran (Studi di Kabupaten Tulang Bawang, Tuba Barat, dan Mesuji Lampung). CosmoGov, 5(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v5i2.22803

Muluk, M. R. K. (2009). Peta Konsep Desentralisasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah. ITS Press.

Olson, W. P. (2012). Fairness, Financial Autonomy and Independence: Lessons from Regulated Industries. The Electricity Journal, 25(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2011.12.005

Oulasvirta, L., & Turala, M. (2009). Financial autonomy and consistency of central government policy towards local governments. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309104178

Phaup, M. (2019). Budgeting for Mandatory Spending: Prologue to Reform. Public Budgeting & Finance, 39(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12210

Program Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan Sistem Irigasi di Indonesia. (2018).

Rahula, S. A., & Bowo, P. A. (2021). The Effect of General Allocation Funds and Local Own-Revenue on Regional Government Expenditure in Central Java Province. Indicators: Journal of Economic and Business, 2(1), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.47729/indicators.v2i1.63

Rante, A., Mire, M. S., & Paminto, A. (2017). Analisis Kemandirian Keuangan Daerah. Inovasi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan Dan Manajemen, 13(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.29264/jinv.v13i2.2461

Rasyid, M. R. (2004). Makna Pemerintahan: Tinjauan dari Segi Etika dan Kepemimpinan. PT. Mutiara Sumber Widya.

Riker, W. H. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Little, Brown and Company.

Safutra, I. (Ed.). (2019, November 7). Potret Pendidikan Tanah Air: 333.645 Ruang Kelas Butuh Perbaikan. JawaPos.Com. https://www.jawapos.com/nasional/pendidikan/07/11/2019/potret-pendidikan-tanah-air-333-645-ruang-kelas-butuh-perbaikan/

Saunders, C. (2018). Comparing Fiscal Federalism. In A. Valdesalici & F. Palermo (Eds.), Comparing Fiscal Federalism. Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004340954

Smith, B. C. (2012). Desentralisasi Dimensi Teritorial Suatu Negara. Penerbit MIPI.

Sohail, S., Ullah, S., & Javid, A. Y. (2021). Fiscal decentralization, institutional quality, and government size: an asymmetry analysis for Asian economies. Transnational Corporations Review, 0(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2021.1956855

Suwandi, I. M., & Yahya, A. S. (2017). Refleksi Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia (A. S. Yahya (Ed.); 1st ed.). Alqaprint.

Tingkat Kemantapan Jalan Provinsi, Kabupaten/Kota. (2020).

Vicente, C., Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2013). Transparency and Political Budget Cycles at municipal level. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12036

Wang, K., Liu, L., Adebayo, T. S., LobonÈ›, O.-R., & Claudia, M. N. (2021). Fiscal decentralization, political stability and resources curse hypothesis: A case of fiscal decentralized economies. Resources Policy, 72(January), 102071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102071

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Khairi, H. (2021). Balance Between Delegation of Authority and Submission of Regional Revenue Sources in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.431-443

Issue

Section

Articles